.jpg)
MCC Economics sets out how to build return on investment models for renewable energy projects that survive lender scrutiny: start from partnership and revenue structure, avoid the five recurring modelling mistakes, stress-test with sensitivity analysis, include the variables no model can skip, and treat policy and price volatility as live scenarios.
The 2024-25 landmark deals show that revenue stacks and banking consortia are set before the first formula is written, and each structure changes what the model must demonstrate.
Table 1 summarises three.
Seen across 2024-25 models, five errors recur:
The full catalogue of failure modes is set out by Fin-Wiser.
Modern guidance emphasises three nested approaches, one-way, multi-way and probabilistic Monte Carlo sensitivity, to reveal which levers, irradiance, PPA price, CAPEX and debt margin, truly swing IRR and NPV.
Table 2: Five pillars every solar and renewable ROI model must cover.
In the UK, DESNZ’s 2025 CfD AR7 shift from a fixed budget to a “capacity ambition” meant bid sizing had to remain a live scenario until auction close, as Renewable Exchange explained.
The auction the article told modellers to keep as a live scenario has closed, and it rewarded the caution. AR7 results came in two stages: 8.4 GW of offshore wind in January 2026, then 6.2 GW across solar, onshore wind and tidal in February, including 4.9 GW of solar across 157 projects, the largest UK solar procurement in any CfD round, for a record 14.7 GW in total, as Energy UK summarises. Cleared solar strike prices support the article’s downside advice: RWE’s winning solar bids struck at £65.23/MWh in 2024 prices, below the £70/MWh downside base this article suggested.
It highlights which covenant bites first. At Cleve Hill, a 10% CAPEX overrun hurt the DSCR more than a 5% PPA haircut, so lenders insisted on an EPC fixed price, not a higher tariff, as Quinbrook’s financing shows. Energy arbitrage calculations should reflect future competitive landscapes, and cost forecasts should reflect observed cost curves, especially if capex sits multiple years ahead.
LCOE inputs (CAPEX, OPEX, yield), financing metrics (WACC, DSCR), tax shields, degradation, curtailment, merchant tail and exit multiple, with optionality to add batteries if not already included, per Fin-Wiser’s checklist.
Run a policy-off and policy-on pair of cases, for example a CfD lapse or a UAE green-certificate boost, then layer price-path volatility using a fundamental model to test break-even IRR under each regime, as Energy Exemplar describes. Try to insure against policy shifts: the USA offers recent examples of policy changes that negatively affected returns.
I was delighted that MCC's work was completed on time, and within budget, helping us deliver important changes and improvements, to the benefit of our stakeholders. MCC's report is published on the CCC website.
I am delighted to recommend MCC Economics. Specifically, I worked closely with PJ, who helped us with our Nuclear and CCUS projects. PJ helped us develop new policies and answer questions from our stakeholders. His support helped us deliver important changes and improvements, to the benefit of our stakeholders.
MCC Economics has helped us better understand the most important issues for our stakeholders, including: charges, shareholder returns, debt payments and inflation impacts.
I am delighted to recommend PJ and his team at MCC Economics. We've been working together on National Policy Statements to help meet net zero targets for 2030 and 2050. We initially appointed MCC Economics to support us on offshore wind consultation analysis and have recently reappointed MCC Economics to undertake a larger consultation analysis role across all sectors, including hydrogen, CCUS and networks. I can confirm that PJ and his team have shown excellent spreadsheet skills, alongside very good project management, planning and analysis skills, helping us deliver important changes, and continuous improvements, to the benefit of our stakeholders.
I am delighted to recommend PJ and his team from MCC Economics. They helped us with our price controls for Heathrow airport and for NATS (En Route) plc (the air traffic services provider). Specifically, the MCC team helped us deliver important changes and improvements to our financial models and supporting policy documents, to the benefit of our stakeholders.
I am delighted to confirm that I worked with PJ on a retail project in 2015. The project helped stakeholders understand electricity costs and charges. Specifically, the project helped us explain to stakeholders, internally and externally, why electricity charges differed across the regions (GB, NI & Ireland). PJ was a key member on the project team, which helped deliver changes and improvements in the understanding of energy retail.
.png)
Evidence-based analysis for transparent, defensible, and effective decision-making.
© All rights reserved – MCC Economics 2026.
