Publications

MCC Economics publishes independent analysis and commentary on issues at the intersection of economics, finance, and regulation. Our publications draw on experience from projects across energy, water, infrastructure, and public policy - providing evidence-based insights that support transparent, accountable, and effective decision-making.

Filter by:
Clear
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

A Report for the Climate Change Committee: Summarising the Call for Evidence Responses for Offsets

Explore MCC Economics’ evidence to the UK Climate Change Committee on strengthening the integrity and governance of carbon offsetting.

This report presents MCC Economics's evidence submission to the UK Climate Change Committee (CCC) on the role of carbon offsetting within national decarbonisation pathways. Drawing on our experience in regulatory economics and market design, the report evaluates the effectiveness, credibility, and governance of offsetting mechanisms in supporting net zero delivery. It considers both voluntary and compliance markets, highlighting the risks of overreliance on offsets and proposing frameworks to ensure integrity, transparency, and additionality in emission reduction claims.

The Climate Change Committee launched a call for evidence to assess the contribution of carbon offsetting to the UK’s net zero strategy. MCC Economics’ submission responds with a critical economic assessment of current offsetting practices, identifying where market and policy interventions can improve outcomes. The report outlines key challenges in monitoring, verification, and permanence of offsets; economic incentives that drive offset demand and supply; principles for integrating offsetting within credible transition plans; and recommendations for regulatory consistency, data disclosure, and international coordination. Our evidence supports a balanced approach that recognises offsetting’s potential while reinforcing the primacy of direct emission reductions.

About

Abstract

Financial Modelling
2022
PJ McCloskey
Government Administration

The approach for Abu Dhabi’s solar energy: Centralised or Decentralised

Explore our latest paper which examines Abu Dhabi’s solar approach—centralised utility-scale vs. distributed rooftop generation. Finds rooftop PV still uneconomical for heavily subsidised user groups but cost-effective for industry and commerce, suggesting subsidy reforms to unlock distributed solar for 2050 climate goals.

Abu Dhabi faces a strategic choice in scaling up solar energy: centralised mega-projects or decentralsed rooftop systems. This paper by our Director PJ McCloskey and analyst Rodrigo Remor analyses why distributed solar uptake remains low in Abu Dhabi and evaluates its economic viability under current conditions. Abu Dhabi has so far favored large solar parks (e.g. the 1.17 GW Noor Abu Dhabi plant) while rooftop solar adoption is minimal (~2.94 MW on government buildings by 2020, <1% of Noor’s capacity). Given the UAE’s net-zero commitment and Energy Strategy 2050 targets (44% renewable electricity by 2050), the study explores whether decentralised solar could play a larger role and what policy shifts might be required.

This paper evaluates the economic viability of decentralised solar systems in Abu Dhabi. By analysing levelised cost of electricity (LCOE), net present value (NPV), and internal rate of return (IRR) across customer groups, it finds that while rooftop solar generation is not yet cost-effective for heavily subsidised sectors, it remains viable for industrial and commercial users. The study suggests that subsidy reform could significantly improve the financial appeal of decentralised systems, aligning with Abu Dhabi’s decarbonisation targets under the UAE Energy Strategy 2050.

About

Abstract

Economic Analysis
2022
Rodrigo Malheiros Remor
Energy

The approach for Abu Dhabi’s solar energy:  Centralised or Decentralised

Explore our latest paper which examines Abu Dhabi’s solar approach - centralised utility-scale vs. distributed rooftop generation. Finds rooftop PV still uneconomical for heavily subsidised user groups but cost-effective for industry and commerce, suggesting subsidy reforms to unlock distributed solar for 2050 climate goals.

PR24 WACC Review from MCC for CCW

MCC Economics presents a comprehensive analysis of Ofwat’s PR24 final WACC determination, revealing how late-stage decisions may have shifted financial risk to customers.

MCC Economics, on behalf of the Consumer Council for Water (CCW), has reviewed Ofwat’s PR24 final WACC determination to assess whether it fairly balances customer and investor interests. The report questions Ofwat’s decision to include costs stemming from companies with high financial gearing, arguing this may shift undue risk to customers. By applying a market-based, notional-efficient approach, MCC finds the WACC could have been set 1.08% lower — potentially saving customers £5.4 billion, or £41 per household, over five years. The review also highlights how new risk-reduction mechanisms in PR24 could justify a lower return, offering critical insight for both policymakers and the Competition and Markets Authority.

MCC Economics was commissioned by the Consumer Council for Water (CCW) to review Ofwat’s PR24 final WACC determination. The report examines whether Ofwat’s approach appropriately balances customer interests against investor requirements. It identifies potential upward bias in key components — including the cost of equity and debt — largely influenced by financial behaviours of highly geared companies. MCC proposes a market-led recalibration of the WACC that aligns with the notional efficient company and regulatory best practice. This would reduce the WACC by 1.08%, potentially saving customers £5.4 billion over five years. The report also assesses risk protection measures introduced in PR24 and offers recommendations for future regulatory frameworks and CMA deliberations.

About

Abstract

Regulatory Economics
2023
Warwick Anderson
Utilities

Excellence in Consumer Engagement

This publication outlines 10 fundamental principles for effective engagement, exploring how businesses and regulators can foster trust, enhance decision-making, and create mutually beneficial outcomes.

Regulatory frameworks are evolving to place consumers at the heart of decision-making. "Excellence in Consumer Engagement: 10 Fundamentals" explores the shift from traditional regulatory processes—where decisions were imposed on consumers—to a model where consumers actively influence outcomes. The paper identifies 10 key principles that drive successful engagement, including the importance of social license, leadership commitment, and setting the right incentives. Through case studies and real-world examples, it highlights both the risks of poor engagement and the benefits of genuine collaboration. This guide serves as a resource for regulators, businesses, and policymakers looking to enhance consumer participation in regulatory decision-making.

The landscape of consumer engagement in regulation has undergone a significant transformation, moving from a model where consumers had little influence to one where they play a central role in shaping decisions. This paper presents 10 fundamental principles that underpin effective consumer engagement, including commitment from leadership, social license, and consumer empowerment. It examines both successful and failed approaches to engagement, drawing lessons from key case studies such as the Powerlink Queensland electricity transmission decision and Australia’s banking and energy sector reforms. The study also explores the regulatory incentives that encourage engagement, from reputational benefits to financial rewards. By implementing these principles, businesses and regulators can foster trust, improve regulatory outcomes, and create a more balanced and consumer-centric decision-making process.

About

Abstract

Regulatory Economics
2021
Warwick Anderson
Utilities

Cost of Capital - 10 Hot Topics

Explore our publication which highlights 10 hot topics, from climate change objectives to market risk premiums, providing expert insights on how regulators and businesses navigate these critical financial considerations.

The cost of capital is a fundamental consideration in regulated industries, influencing investment decisions, regulatory outcomes, and financial stability. This publication explores 10 hot topics that are currently shaping cost of capital discussions, including climate change objectives, stability and predictability of regulatory approaches, diminishing comparator firms, and competition for the right to supply. It also examines emerging trends, such as the impact of large-scale investments in renewable energy and the challenges of estimating market risk premiums. Backed by extensive research and regulatory case studies from Australia, New Zealand, and the UK, this paper offers valuable insights for policymakers, industry professionals, and investors.

Cost of capital plays a crucial role in determining regulated revenues, investment attractiveness, and financial resilience in capital-intensive industries. This paper identifies and examines 10 key topics currently influencing regulatory cost of capital decisions, including climate change considerations, evolving methodologies for estimating the market risk premium, and the impact of diminishing publicly listed comparator firms. The study provides a comparative analysis of regulatory approaches from key jurisdictions such as Australia, New Zealand, and the UK, offering insights into best practices and emerging challenges. Additional areas of interest include the role of reasonableness checks, financeability testing, and competition in infrastructure investment. By addressing these pressing issues, this publication serves as a resource for regulators, businesses, and investors seeking to understand and navigate the complexities of cost of capital determinations.

About

Abstract

Regulatory Economics
2024
Warwick Anderson
Energy

ENWL Expensive Electricity?

Discover MCC Economics' detailed analysis of the Electricity North West Limited (ENWL) acquisition by Iberdrola, exploring valuation challenges, regulatory impacts, and the strategic synergies driving this €5 billion transaction.

Electricity North West Limited (ENWL), a regulated monopoly distributing electricity to 5 million customers across North West England, was acquired by Iberdrola in 2024 for €5 billion. MCC Economics’ publication examines the intricacies of this deal, including a significant 44% premium over ENWL’s Regulatory Asset Value (RAV). The analysis delves into ENWL’s financial inefficiencies, high cost of embedded debt, and regulatory challenges under Ofgem’s framework, juxtaposed with its strong equity performance and potential synergies with Iberdrola’s existing networks. This publication provides a comprehensive exploration of the value drivers, risks, and opportunities associated with the acquisition, offering valuable insights for investors and stakeholders in regulated utility markets.

This publication investigates the 2024 acquisition of Electricity North West Limited (ENWL) by Iberdrola, a transaction valued at €5 billion, including debt, and reflecting a substantial 44% premium over ENWL’s Regulatory Asset Value (RAV). ENWL serves as a regulated monopoly responsible for electricity distribution across North West England, supporting the UK’s decarbonisation goals. Key themes explored include ENWL’s financial challenges, regulatory constraints, and Iberdrola’s strategic motivations, including synergies with adjacent networks and growth potential in the transition to electrification. This case study offers critical insights into the valuation of utility assets, regulatory impacts, and the evolving energy landscape.

About

Abstract

Research and Data Analysis
2024
Rodrigo Malheiros Remor
Electricity

Phoenix Energy bargain? Anti-gas or anti-NI sentiment?

Explore MCC Economics’ analysis of the Phoenix Energy acquisition—a critical review of valuation, regulatory challenges, and the evolving energy landscape in Northern Ireland highlighting the risks and opportunities within the energy transition and the implications for investors in regulated utilities.

Dive into MCC Economics' in-depth review of the Phoenix Energy acquisition, focusing on its valuation, regulatory framework, and the broader energy market dynamics. With exclusive gas distribution rights across Greater Belfast, Phoenix Energy faces both challenges and opportunities in the shift towards renewable energy. This case study examines the company’s performance within Northern Ireland’s unique regulatory environment, the implications of stranded assets, and the potential pace of electrification. The report also considers the strategic value of this acquisition for CK Infrastructure Holdings and its alignment with global trends in sustainable energy.

This publication provides a comprehensive analysis of the 2024 acquisition of Phoenix Energy by CK Infrastructure Holdings, valued at approximately £760 million. Phoenix Energy operates as the sole gas distributor in Greater Belfast and has rebranded to reflect its renewable energy aspirations. The report evaluates the deal’s valuation metrics, highlighting a rare alignment with its regulatory asset base, and discusses the risks posed by stranded assets and the potential acceleration of electrification. It further explores the implications of Northern Ireland’s regulatory framework, which supports renewable gas solutions while promoting continued gas network connections. This case study serves as a key reference for stakeholders in mergers, acquisitions, and regulatory policy within the energy sector.

About

Abstract

Financial Strategy
2023
Rodrigo Malheiros Remor
Energy

Investment in Distributed Solar - A case for Abu Dhabi, UAE

Explore how distributed solar generation can transform Abu Dhabi’s energy landscape. Our report reveals the economic and environmental benefits of solar adoption, and accelerated progress toward the UAE's net-zero targets.

Abu Dhabi stands at the forefront of the UAE's clean energy transformation, and distributed solar generation plays a pivotal role in achieving its sustainability goals. Our report delivers a comprehensive analysis of the potential for rooftop and ground-mounted solar systems to reshape the emirate's energy future. The report examines the inefficiencies of electricity subsidies, compares solar costs with current tariffs, and evaluates the economic benefits of adopting distributed solar. It features real-world data on levelized cost of energy (LCOE), payback periods, and return on investment (IRR) for different consumer groups. By modeling growth scenarios, the report highlights how solar adoption could reduce government subsidies by AED 1.5 billion annually and avoid 5 million tonnes of CO₂ emissions by 2030. Packed with actionable insights and practical recommendations, this report is essential for policymakers, investors, and energy professionals looking to lead the UAE’s transition to a sustainable, clean energy future.

This report investigates the potential for distributed solar generation to drive Abu Dhabi's transition to clean energy while addressing the inefficiencies of current electricity subsidies. It explores the economic and environmental case for rooftop and ground-mounted solar systems, highlighting recent cost declines that make solar a viable alternative to fossil fuel-based power. By outlining a clear roadmap, the report positions distributed solar as a key driver of economic efficiency and environmental sustainability in Abu Dhabi.

About

Abstract

Economic Analysis
2021
PJ McCloskey
Solar

Comparative Analysis of ARIMA, VAR, and Linear Regression Models for UAE GDP Forecasting

Explore our publication on UAE GDP forecasting that provides actionable insights into selecting the best forecasting approach for both short-term and long-term economic planning in a dynamic and evolving economy.

Our comprehensive study on UAE GDP forecasting evaluates the effectiveness of three popular econometric models: ARIMA, VAR, and Linear Regression. Using real GDP data, the paper highlights each model's strengths and limitations over short-term and long-term horizons. The findings suggest that ARIMA is most effective for long-term forecasting, while Linear Regression shines in short-term, scenario-based predictions, provided accurate exogenous variable forecasts are available. Dive into this publication to gain valuable insights into forecasting methodologies that can enhance decision-making for businesses and policymakers in the UAE's dynamic economic landscape.

Forecasting GDP is crucial for economic planning and policymaking. This study compares the performance of three widely-used econometric models—ARIMA, VAR, and Linear Regression—using GDP data from the UAE. Employing a rolling forecast approach, we analyze the models’ accuracy over different time horizons. Results indicate ARIMA’s robust long-term forecasting capability, LR models perform better with short-term predictions, particularly when exogenous variable forecasts are accurate. These insights provide a valuable foundation for selecting forecasting models in the UAE’s evolving economy, suggesting ARIMA’s suitability for long-term outlooks and LR for short-term, scenario-based forecasts.

About

Abstract

Financial Modelling
2021
Rodrigo Malheiros Remor
Utilities

MCC's Submission on Accelerating Smart Meter Deployment

Drawing from international examples, the submission offers insights on balancing retailer flexibility with consumer protection and proposes alternative approaches for effective implementation.

MCC Economics and Finance has submitted a detailed response to the Australian Energy Market Commission’s (AEMC) proposed rules for accelerating smart meter deployment. Our submission examines several strategic trade-offs such as balancing consumer consent with retailer flexibility, flat tariffs versus cost-reflective pricing, and managing implementation costs while ensuring consumer benefits. It emphasises the importance of consumer-centric outcomes, particularly for vulnerable groups, and explores international examples from the UK, Finland, Germany, and France to highlight successful models of smart meter integration. MCC also raises questions about whether retailers are best positioned to lead the roll-out and suggests considering network companies for this role if early success is not achieved under the current proposal. The submission concludes by supporting the AEMC’s initiatives while advocating for ongoing evaluation and innovation to maximise consumer benefits.

This paper discusses the strategic trade-offs involved in implementing new rules, including balancing consumer protection with retailer flexibility and cost-effectiveness. It draws from international case studies to illustrate best practices for smart meter integration, particularly in relation to consumer benefits, technology, and phased implementation. The submission also questions whether retailers are best placed to lead the deployment and suggests considering network companies if needed. MCC fully supports the AEMC’s efforts and offers recommendations for ensuring the success of smart meter rollouts in Australia.

About

Abstract

Economic Analysis
2024
Warwick Anderson
Electricity

Economic Impact Assessment

Explore our article to understand how Economic Impact Assessments (EIA) use input-output models to analyze the economic interdependencies and contributions of your project.

Discover the comprehensive insights provided by Economic Impact Assessments (EIA). This article delves into how EIAs measure the effects of economic activities on specified areas, highlighting direct, indirect, and induced impacts. Learn about economic multipliers, input-output models, and case studies from Scotland, Ireland, and the UAE to understand the broader economic implications of investments and projects.

Economic Impact Assessments (EIA) are vital tools for understanding the comprehensive effects of economic activities on specified regions. This article explores how EIAs quantify impacts in monetary terms, such as GDP, Gross Value Added, and employment opportunities, categorized into direct, indirect, and induced effects. It explains the role of economic multipliers, like the Keynesian and bank multipliers, and their practical applications through input-output models. Readers will gain insights into the methodologies behind EIA, including the development of industry-specific multipliers and their use in calculating total economic impacts. The article features detailed case studies from Scotland, Ireland, and the UAE, demonstrating the real-world application of EIAs. Through these examples, the article illustrates how EIAs help businesses and governments make informed decisions by revealing the ripple effects of investments and projects on local economies. Explore this article to understand the foundational principles and practical benefits of Economic Impact Assessments.

About

Abstract

Data Science
2021
Rodrigo Malheiros Remor
Utilities